Huh? SCIENCE FICTION WHOSIS? What the heck is an SF EYE?
I don't admonish your bafflement, young one. The digital record of the existence of SFE is sparse. History accumulates so swiftly these days, that anything left unattended upon its death is swiftly buried beneath a tide of newness. So please listen to the ancient recollections of a Master, and be enlightened.
SFE was born in the heady cyberpunk years, in the wake of the folding of Bruce Sterling's CHEAP TRUTH, when he bade his disciples to go forth and found a million zines to carry on the good and noble fight for better speculative fiction. SFE was the ideological and graphical brainchild of the multi-talented and passionate Steve Brown (or as the masthead invariably listed him, "Stephen P. Brown"). It was not a unique kind of forum, following in the footsteps of many earlier "sercon" zines such as RIVERSIDE QUARTERLY, QUANTUM/THRUST, SCIENCE FICTION REVIEW, ALIEN CRITIC, et al. But it certainly captured the zeitgeist. Here's what Mark Frauenfelder had to say about it in an issue of WIRED:
"Science fiction fans consist mainly of hobbit-huggers, calculator-wielders, tree nymphs, and trekkies. Each group has its own sci-fi subgenre 'zine to read while waiting for the next WorldCon costume contest, but what about the tiny gang of folks that view science fiction as a supercharged way to think about the present? That gang reads (and writes) SCIENCE FICTION EYE, a fat nonfiction quarterly with great graphics and regular columns by Bruce Sterling, Paul DiFilippo, and Richard Kadrey. It's like going to a party where all your favorite writers are discussing the real-life issues that inspire their fiction - morphogenic field theory, the breakup of the Soviet Union, the history of Bohemianism. These and a dozen other subjects are dished out with passion every issue. The best part of SF EYE is the letters column, where everybody pulls off their gloves and goes at each other on issues ranging from abortion to the possibilities of cloning a cow from a packet of Jell-O. If science fiction means more to you than zapgun-blasting elves astride cyborg unicorns, you'll like EYE."
A very nice encapsulation of SFE's attractions, from one who, as founder of BOING-BOING, was part and parcel of the whole scene at the time.
The final issue of SFE, near as I can ascertain from surveying my own collection, though memory may be betraying me, was Number 15, Fall 1997. A glorious ten-year existence, then, all funded magnanimously out of Steve's own pockets.
I would venture to assert that there is nothing like SFE currently in existence--a venue where the important controversies of the day can be thrashed out, where writers can pursue their entertaining crotchets--and that the field is poorer for such a lack.
But wait! Perhaps there are bits and pieces of 21st-century versions of SFE still cohering.
Such as this very blog!
All four of us wrote for SCIENCE FICTION EYE! This is a reunion! Hoist the brave standard high!
Perhaps the "+1" member here is really Stephen P. Brown!
April 13 2007, 15:44:12 UTC 5 years ago
April 13 2007, 15:55:00 UTC 5 years ago
Merry Man
Of course! Steve is Merry Man -- I should have realized!What is he up to today? It would be great to have him chime in on the anniversary of SFeye, a magazine that had to be read slowly and savored word by word. I think you're right, Paul, and there really isn't anything like it today -- the medium of the "Internets" is too different, too fast and hungry.
April 13 2007, 15:59:54 UTC 5 years ago
April 13 2007, 16:03:07 UTC 5 years ago
I wonder about this:
The best part of SF EYE is the letters column, where everybody pulls off their gloves and goes at each other on issues ranging from abortion to the possibilities of cloning a cow from a packet of Jell-O.
Is there anywhere with a letters column like that any more, or have onine forums entirely replaced them? I would like to think there's room for both, but increasingly it seems that might not be the case.
April 13 2007, 16:07:00 UTC 5 years ago
I too am a long-time lover of SF EYE. It took me three years of Ebay-ing to assemble a complete run, but I have never had such pleasure as when I've taken an afternoon to sit down with a stack and read through them.
But back to your fab timing.
On May 1, Jonathan McCalmont and I are launching a critical webzine, Scalpel Magazine, at http://www.scalpel-magazine.com By no coincidence, SF EYE was one of the models often referred to while we worked through our goals for the zine.
I invite each and every one of you to contribute. We want to deepen the dialogue, dig back into the roots of SFF and get the debate moving again.
So you see, you're absolutely right. There are/b> still bits and pieces of SF EYE cohering.
--gabe chouinard
April 13 2007, 18:14:48 UTC 5 years ago
Anonymous
April 13 2007, 16:08:39 UTC 5 years ago
That magazine was a portal into a whole new world. I sometimes think it was like the first Velvet Underground album -- not that many people read it or wrote for it, but almost everyone who did went on to have some sort of literary career.
Steve, where are you???
Anonymous
April 13 2007, 16:12:34 UTC 5 years ago
That magazine was a portal into a whole new world. I sometimes think it was like the first Velvet Underground album -- not that many people read it or wrote for it, but almost everyone who did went on to have some sort of literary career.
Steve and a bunch of other DC-area writers had a sort of adjunct to the Eye, a writers' group informally known as the Vicious Circle; they welcomed me into the group when I was in my 20s and struggling with what became my first novel, Winterlong. I would never have become a writer without their encouragement and the chance to hone my chops in the Eye's pages.
Steve, where are you?!?!?
April 13 2007, 16:45:09 UTC 5 years ago
Dunno about The Velvet Underground, but SF Eye for me and many like me was our Crawdaddy! and our Sniffin' Glue an more.
5 years ago
Anonymous
5 years ago
April 13 2007, 16:14:39 UTC 5 years ago
Great! Post something provocative, no legendary!
Anonymous
April 13 2007, 17:09:09 UTC 5 years ago
And you're right, that was definitely one of the greatest things about it — the range of writers and points of view that Steve encouraged was incredible. He wanted EVERYTHING in there — and for a while he got it. The Eye had a far broader remit than most publications I read back then, and as far as I know, Steve was open to anything. Including dissenting views -- but what was there to argue with?
It was a great enterprise. I wonder if Steve knows how much impact it had? I hope so.
April 13 2007, 17:13:30 UTC 5 years ago
From what I've seen? Pretty much everything that either Darrell Schweitzer or Paul Riddell ever had to say!
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
Anonymous
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
Anonymous
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
Anonymous
April 13 2007, 17:12:16 UTC 5 years ago
April 13 2007, 17:35:30 UTC 5 years ago
April 13 2007, 18:19:23 UTC 5 years ago
April 13 2007, 19:46:53 UTC 5 years ago
Anonymous
April 13 2007, 18:49:47 UTC 5 years ago
The Eye ...
I've sent a note off to Steve about this. I suspect he'll be amused and feeling much olderBack in the day we shared a house in Baltimore. Along with various other fans who came and went. Vaguely like a slan shack.
Michael Walsh
www.oldearthbooks.com
April 13 2007, 21:32:48 UTC 5 years ago
Re: The Eye ...
want to share his email?April 13 2007, 19:03:24 UTC 5 years ago
April 13 2007, 19:19:37 UTC 5 years ago
Jeez,
Is it really 10 years since the last copy?SF Eye sat in the middle of a tradition from Dangerous Visions to New Worlds to Rapid Eye and Semiotext(e). But where is that critical literary view of Sci-Fi now?
And what happened to Slipstream?
April 13 2007, 19:53:11 UTC 5 years ago
Re: Jeez,
As for that critical literary view of SF, you're looking at it. In a lot of ways, I prefer blogging to the print magazines when it came to good pithy commentary: precious few blogs have you wait years between installments, and most of it would be painfully out of date by the time it saw dead-tree print anyway. Besides, if you're not going to get paid for it, why not take creative control?April 13 2007, 20:16:05 UTC 5 years ago
Steve was (and still is, wherever that may be) literary, counter-culture Zelig: he knew everyone and had a story about all of 'em. (Kind of like Lucius, actually.) My personal fave: Steve washing dishes with Tom Pynchon. Second best: the Ringling Bros. Circus saga.
Anonymous
April 13 2007, 20:57:16 UTC 5 years ago
The Great Chain of Causation
Semiotext(e) SF had an advertisement for Science Fiction Eye.Science Fiction Eye had an ad for bOING bOING.
bOING bOING had an ad for Extropy.
And thus, a chance purchase by a friend of mine at St. Mark's Books lead inexorably to... something or other.
April 13 2007, 22:10:54 UTC 5 years ago
Has it been twenty years? Ghod, we're gettin' old.
Last I heard, Steve was distributing agricultural publications from the wilds of North Carolina. Talk about GAFIATing.
Anonymous
April 13 2007, 23:07:51 UTC 5 years ago
Yes, i think Steve and Jo still run Common Ground down there near Asheville. Hope we hear from him -- maybe we could entice him to Readercon for a twenty year reunion?
Anonymous
April 14 2007, 14:02:28 UTC 5 years ago
JeffV
April 17 2007, 18:23:55 UTC 5 years ago
So nice...
He was nice in his letters, but he never sent me the issues I paid for. Nor the back issues I paid for. I still have the letter somewhere where he told me that he would make up for his mistake in lapsing my subscription.So I'm with PTR on this one.
But it would be fantastic to start writing for something in that vein. It definitely influenced much of my life at the time it started out. In fact Steve had a free ad for my friend's zine Jack Ruby Slippers in which I had some poetry and a poem about me.
My ex-boyfriend/band-mate was in LOVE with Misha. He even purchased everything she ever published.
April 14 2007, 16:15:33 UTC 5 years ago
If I remember correctly, that Disclave had Bill Gibson as a guest of honor. It was also the venue for the shouting match between John Shirley and Greg Benford, which became fodder for the next Eye's letters pages.
I got Steve to come to Readercon for a few years, then we lost track of him.
Anonymous
May 17 2007, 11:47:45 UTC 5 years ago
Thank you to sclerotic rings and mrblem for remembering that there were actually two editors and publishers (and in my case, art director as well) for the original SF EYE. I appreciate it when a few folks recall that small, but important to me, fact.
When I originally approached my best friend Steve with the idea of a magazine called SF EYE to replace Geis' recently deceased SF REVIEW I knew that he had all the literary chops and connections that I didn't have and would be the perfect partner. And for a couple of years he was. I originally thought we could start a small empire of EYE magazines: MYSTERY EYE, COMICS EYE, etc., but our marriage fell apart due to many mistakes I made during the production of the fifth issue that had delayed its publication and Steve's got wildly concerned that my actions would sully his reputation amongst his writer pals. There was no other choice but to go our separate ways. Because Steve had the means to support our baby he got custody. *sigh* Needless to say, it was a bad divorce and we haven't spoken to each other in about 17 years.
One of his last letters to me celebrated that without me the magazine would finally be able to come out three times a year. As I recall, he never made it.
Nevertheless, it is great to know that the magazine and the things it accomplished haven't been forgotten.
Oh, and by the way, the Fiction Issue was the third issue and if I'd had my way, they would have all looked like that one. I'm still very pleased with how it came out.
Thanks too Paul, as well, for being one of our star regulars. I'm honored to have been able to publish his sterling prose.
Dan Steffan
July 24 2007, 13:45:24 UTC 4 years ago
SF EYE Contributor
I wrote for SF Eye a few times, and I still miss the magazine. What a wonderful forum that was, and what a great feeling these many years later to have been a (small) part of it all.