Paul Di Filippo ([info]pgdf) wrote in [info]theinferior4,

Science Fiction Eye

This year marks the twentieth anniversary of the first issue of SCIENCE FICTION EYE.



Huh? SCIENCE FICTION WHOSIS? What the heck is an SF EYE?

I don't admonish your bafflement, young one. The digital record of the existence of SFE is sparse. History accumulates so swiftly these days, that anything left unattended upon its death is swiftly buried beneath a tide of newness. So please listen to the ancient recollections of a Master, and be enlightened.

SFE was born in the heady cyberpunk years, in the wake of the folding of Bruce Sterling's CHEAP TRUTH, when he bade his disciples to go forth and found a million zines to carry on the good and noble fight for better speculative fiction. SFE was the ideological and graphical brainchild of the multi-talented and passionate Steve Brown (or as the masthead invariably listed him, "Stephen P. Brown"). It was not a unique kind of forum, following in the footsteps of many earlier "sercon" zines such as RIVERSIDE QUARTERLY, QUANTUM/THRUST, SCIENCE FICTION REVIEW, ALIEN CRITIC, et al. But it certainly captured the zeitgeist. Here's what Mark Frauenfelder had to say about it in an issue of WIRED:

"Science fiction fans consist mainly of hobbit-huggers, calculator-wielders, tree nymphs, and trekkies. Each group has its own sci-fi subgenre 'zine to read while waiting for the next WorldCon costume contest, but what about the tiny gang of folks that view science fiction as a supercharged way to think about the present? That gang reads (and writes) SCIENCE FICTION EYE, a fat nonfiction quarterly with great graphics and regular columns by Bruce Sterling, Paul DiFilippo, and Richard Kadrey. It's like going to a party where all your favorite writers are discussing the real-life issues that inspire their fiction - morphogenic field theory, the breakup of the Soviet Union, the history of Bohemianism. These and a dozen other subjects are dished out with passion every issue. The best part of SF EYE is the letters column, where everybody pulls off their gloves and goes at each other on issues ranging from abortion to the possibilities of cloning a cow from a packet of Jell-O. If science fiction means more to you than zapgun-blasting elves astride cyborg unicorns, you'll like EYE."

A very nice encapsulation of SFE's attractions, from one who, as founder of BOING-BOING, was part and parcel of the whole scene at the time.

The final issue of SFE, near as I can ascertain from surveying my own collection, though memory may be betraying me, was Number 15, Fall 1997. A glorious ten-year existence, then, all funded magnanimously out of Steve's own pockets.

I would venture to assert that there is nothing like SFE currently in existence--a venue where the important controversies of the day can be thrashed out, where writers can pursue their entertaining crotchets--and that the field is poorer for such a lack.

But wait! Perhaps there are bits and pieces of 21st-century versions of SFE still cohering.

Such as this very blog!

All four of us wrote for SCIENCE FICTION EYE! This is a reunion! Hoist the brave standard high!

Perhaps the "+1" member here is really Stephen P. Brown!

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 45 comments

[info]pigeonhed

April 13 2007, 15:44:12 UTC 5 years ago

I have a full run of SF Eye in the vault. An excellent and much missed journal that introduced me to much great SF and other stuff. Hey I even had two letters printed in it!

[info]paulwitcover

April 13 2007, 15:55:00 UTC 5 years ago

Merry Man

Of course! Steve is Merry Man -- I should have realized!

What is he up to today? It would be great to have him chime in on the anniversary of SFeye, a magazine that had to be read slowly and savored word by word. I think you're right, Paul, and there really isn't anything like it today -- the medium of the "Internets" is too different, too fast and hungry.

[info]grahamsleight

April 13 2007, 15:59:54 UTC 5 years ago

It was just plain awesome. God knows how copies reached teenage suburban me, but there are plenty of pieces in there that really formed my view of the field - Liz on Delany's Neveryon, your column, Paul, and Sterling's, Grant's "The Exile's Paradigm" (despite its strawman version of Clarion), McAllister's account of working at Disneyland in the Summer of Love...

[info]coalescent

April 13 2007, 16:03:07 UTC 5 years ago

I don't have anything like a complete run of SF Eye -- in fact, the only issues I have are a handful I borrowed from a friend ages ago and really should return. But from what I've seen, it was a great magazine. I wouldn't say I want to remake Vector in its image, quite, but I certainly feel it's one of the benchmarks against which I would expect -- want -- Vector to be judged.

I wonder about this:

The best part of SF EYE is the letters column, where everybody pulls off their gloves and goes at each other on issues ranging from abortion to the possibilities of cloning a cow from a packet of Jell-O.

Is there anywhere with a letters column like that any more, or have onine forums entirely replaced them? I would like to think there's room for both, but increasingly it seems that might not be the case.

[info]deadcities_icon

April 13 2007, 16:07:00 UTC 5 years ago

What wonderful timing you have, Paul!

I too am a long-time lover of SF EYE. It took me three years of Ebay-ing to assemble a complete run, but I have never had such pleasure as when I've taken an afternoon to sit down with a stack and read through them.

But back to your fab timing.

On May 1, Jonathan McCalmont and I are launching a critical webzine, Scalpel Magazine, at http://www.scalpel-magazine.com By no coincidence, SF EYE was one of the models often referred to while we worked through our goals for the zine.

I invite each and every one of you to contribute. We want to deepen the dialogue, dig back into the roots of SFF and get the debate moving again.

So you see, you're absolutely right. There are/b> still bits and pieces of SF EYE cohering.

--gabe chouinard

[info]mssrcrankypants

April 13 2007, 18:14:48 UTC 5 years ago

That sounds great. All the genres need more serious, critical attention.

Anonymous

April 13 2007, 16:08:39 UTC 5 years ago

That's amazing -- both that it's been 20 years, and also that we all wrote for SFE at some point. That was where I was first published, I think in 1988 -- a review of Ian Banks' The Bridge.

That magazine was a portal into a whole new world. I sometimes think it was like the first Velvet Underground album -- not that many people read it or wrote for it, but almost everyone who did went on to have some sort of literary career.

Steve, where are you???




Anonymous

April 13 2007, 16:12:34 UTC 5 years ago

That's amazing -- both that it's been 20 years, and also that we all wrote for SFE at some point. That was where I was first published, I think in 1988 -- a review of Ian Banks' The Bridge.

That magazine was a portal into a whole new world. I sometimes think it was like the first Velvet Underground album -- not that many people read it or wrote for it, but almost everyone who did went on to have some sort of literary career.

Steve and a bunch of other DC-area writers had a sort of adjunct to the Eye, a writers' group informally known as the Vicious Circle; they welcomed me into the group when I was in my 20s and struggling with what became my first novel, Winterlong. I would never have become a writer without their encouragement and the chance to hone my chops in the Eye's pages.

Steve, where are you?!?!?




[info]pigeonhed

April 13 2007, 16:45:09 UTC 5 years ago

Liz, I remember your stuff in SF Eye well, including that Banks review. The thing is in a way you are wrong about only a few people wrote for it, because the range of contributors seemed to me to be one of its many strengths. From the c-punks like Sterling and Shiner, the humanist response from Kessel, through you guys, mavericks like Kadrey, Hogan and Misha, and the debates with Chris DeVito etc too. Without SF Eye I doubt I'd have read Nabokov (thanks to Paul DF) for instance. Before SF Eye I'd never encountered you or Paul W, in an issue I bought because of some great stuff on Lucius. I vividly remember first reading about Stelarc there, and about 'The Discovery Of Television Amongst bees' (?), and oh so many more things I'll not forget.

Dunno about The Velvet Underground, but SF Eye for me and many like me was our Crawdaddy! and our Sniffin' Glue an more.

[info]grimmwire

5 years ago

Anonymous

5 years ago

[info]nihilistic_kid

April 13 2007, 16:14:39 UTC 5 years ago

Will this be the new SF Eye?

Great! Post something provocative, no legendary!

Anonymous

April 13 2007, 17:09:09 UTC 5 years ago

Yeah, there were a ton of people who wrote for it -- sorry, I meant in the vast mainstream literary arena.

And you're right, that was definitely one of the greatest things about it — the range of writers and points of view that Steve encouraged was incredible. He wanted EVERYTHING in there — and for a while he got it. The Eye had a far broader remit than most publications I read back then, and as far as I know, Steve was open to anything. Including dissenting views -- but what was there to argue with?

It was a great enterprise. I wonder if Steve knows how much impact it had? I hope so.







[info]deadcities_icon

April 13 2007, 17:13:30 UTC 5 years ago

"The Eye had a far broader remit than most publications I read back then, and as far as I know, Steve was open to anything. Including dissenting views -- but what was there to argue with?"

From what I've seen? Pretty much everything that either Darrell Schweitzer or Paul Riddell ever had to say!

[info]lizhand

5 years ago

[info]lizhand

5 years ago

Anonymous

5 years ago

[info]lucius_t

5 years ago

Anonymous

5 years ago

[info]robinpen

5 years ago

Anonymous

April 13 2007, 17:12:16 UTC 5 years ago

BTW, that great Lucius interview piece was done by my friend Rafael Sa'adah, a terrific writer himself and now a battalion chief in the DCFD.

[info]sclerotic_rings

April 13 2007, 17:35:30 UTC 5 years ago

What's really sad is that the Eye would probably still be here if not for the implosion of Fine Print. I may have had serious issues both with its increasingly spotty publication schedule (it got the nickname "The Last Dangerous Magazine" for a reason) and with Steve's ever-increasingly ridiculous reasons as to why it took 2 1/2 years between issues at times, but I still miss it for various obscure reasons. (Oh, and you're right about the 1997 issue being the last one. Steve told only a couple of people, Joey Zone in particular, that he was shutting things down in 1999, and Dan Steffan, the co-publisher for the first five issues, only found out that it was defunct after he read an article I wrote about its demise.)

[info]lizhand

April 13 2007, 18:19:23 UTC 5 years ago

Didn't Mischa also lay into a book with a shotgun? Or is that just wishful thinking on my part?

[info]sclerotic_rings

April 13 2007, 19:46:53 UTC 5 years ago

Nope: she shotgunned one, chainsawed another, and let her dog rip apart a third. Considering some of the crap she was reviewing, the authors probably got their best reviews on the books in question from her.

Anonymous

April 13 2007, 18:49:47 UTC 5 years ago

The Eye ...

I've sent a note off to Steve about this. I suspect he'll be amused and feeling much older

Back in the day we shared a house in Baltimore. Along with various other fans who came and went. Vaguely like a slan shack.

Michael Walsh
www.oldearthbooks.com

[info]lucius_t

April 13 2007, 21:32:48 UTC 5 years ago

Re: The Eye ...

want to share his email?

[info]ron_drummond

April 13 2007, 19:03:24 UTC 5 years ago

Paul, thank you for a wonderful homage to an amazing irreplaceable magazine. Writing a long critical fiction for Stephen Probability Brown was among the highlights of my life – I will never forget our telephonic editorial conferences, the man had an unerring, uncanny sense of what works and what doesn’t and how to encourage me to swerve through the former while still breaking boundaries and discovering the very best I had in me and how to bring it out. He is one of a kind.

[info]voidstar

April 13 2007, 19:19:37 UTC 5 years ago

Jeez,

Is it really 10 years since the last copy?

SF Eye sat in the middle of a tradition from Dangerous Visions to New Worlds to Rapid Eye and Semiotext(e). But where is that critical literary view of Sci-Fi now?

And what happened to Slipstream?

[info]sclerotic_rings

April 13 2007, 19:53:11 UTC 5 years ago

Re: Jeez,

As for that critical literary view of SF, you're looking at it. In a lot of ways, I prefer blogging to the print magazines when it came to good pithy commentary: precious few blogs have you wait years between installments, and most of it would be painfully out of date by the time it saw dead-tree print anyway. Besides, if you're not going to get paid for it, why not take creative control?

[info]lizhand

April 13 2007, 20:16:05 UTC 5 years ago

Yeah, but with blogs you miss out on that once-a-year (or more) better'n Christmas feeling you got whilst anticipating the arrival (by post) of the big fat envelope that held the Eye.

Steve was (and still is, wherever that may be) literary, counter-culture Zelig: he knew everyone and had a story about all of 'em. (Kind of like Lucius, actually.) My personal fave: Steve washing dishes with Tom Pynchon. Second best: the Ringling Bros. Circus saga.

Anonymous

April 13 2007, 20:57:16 UTC 5 years ago

The Great Chain of Causation

Semiotext(e) SF had an advertisement for Science Fiction Eye.

Science Fiction Eye had an ad for bOING bOING.

bOING bOING had an ad for Extropy.

And thus, a chance purchase by a friend of mine at St. Mark's Books lead inexorably to... something or other.

[info]grimmwire

April 13 2007, 22:10:54 UTC 5 years ago

Ah, the EYE, the All-Seeing EYE! How we miss it! No SF zine has ever been more passionate, more off-the-deep-end, more visually audacious. All my best review work was written for the EYE. I was particularly proud of my piece on The Difference Engine.

Has it been twenty years? Ghod, we're gettin' old.

Last I heard, Steve was distributing agricultural publications from the wilds of North Carolina. Talk about GAFIATing.

Anonymous

April 13 2007, 23:07:51 UTC 5 years ago

Jeez, thank god for the internet, so I could find a definition for gafiate.

Yes, i think Steve and Jo still run Common Ground down there near Asheville. Hope we hear from him -- maybe we could entice him to Readercon for a twenty year reunion?

Anonymous

April 14 2007, 14:02:28 UTC 5 years ago

I loved SF Eye. Just absolutely loved it. Horribly upset when it went away. And Brown was so nice--when Ministry couldn't afford to reprint Chapman's The Troika after the first print run, because we didn't know what returns would be on the first print run, or when the distributor would pay us, Brown gave us enough cash to add to our own to get it done.

JeffV

[info]mollyblack

April 17 2007, 18:23:55 UTC 5 years ago

So nice...

He was nice in his letters, but he never sent me the issues I paid for. Nor the back issues I paid for. I still have the letter somewhere where he told me that he would make up for his mistake in lapsing my subscription.

So I'm with PTR on this one.

But it would be fantastic to start writing for something in that vein. It definitely influenced much of my life at the time it started out. In fact Steve had a free ad for my friend's zine Jack Ruby Slippers in which I had some poetry and a poem about me.

My ex-boyfriend/band-mate was in LOVE with Misha. He even purchased everything she ever published.

[info]mrbelm

April 14 2007, 16:15:33 UTC 5 years ago

I was at the 1985 (?) Disclave, wandering through the dealer's room, when a large bearded fellow yelled "Hey kid, buy this magazine!" It was Dan Steffan, he was waving issue number 2 - the ridiculously oversized "fiction issue" - at me. I have 'em all, I became a lifetime subscriber, for what that was worth.

If I remember correctly, that Disclave had Bill Gibson as a guest of honor. It was also the venue for the shouting match between John Shirley and Greg Benford, which became fodder for the next Eye's letters pages.

I got Steve to come to Readercon for a few years, then we lost track of him.

Anonymous

May 17 2007, 11:47:45 UTC 5 years ago

Ahh, has it been twenty years already. One more year and my baby will be able to join me in the bar for a drink.

Thank you to sclerotic rings and mrblem for remembering that there were actually two editors and publishers (and in my case, art director as well) for the original SF EYE. I appreciate it when a few folks recall that small, but important to me, fact.

When I originally approached my best friend Steve with the idea of a magazine called SF EYE to replace Geis' recently deceased SF REVIEW I knew that he had all the literary chops and connections that I didn't have and would be the perfect partner. And for a couple of years he was. I originally thought we could start a small empire of EYE magazines: MYSTERY EYE, COMICS EYE, etc., but our marriage fell apart due to many mistakes I made during the production of the fifth issue that had delayed its publication and Steve's got wildly concerned that my actions would sully his reputation amongst his writer pals. There was no other choice but to go our separate ways. Because Steve had the means to support our baby he got custody. *sigh* Needless to say, it was a bad divorce and we haven't spoken to each other in about 17 years.

One of his last letters to me celebrated that without me the magazine would finally be able to come out three times a year. As I recall, he never made it.

Nevertheless, it is great to know that the magazine and the things it accomplished haven't been forgotten.

Oh, and by the way, the Fiction Issue was the third issue and if I'd had my way, they would have all looked like that one. I'm still very pleased with how it came out.

Thanks too Paul, as well, for being one of our star regulars. I'm honored to have been able to publish his sterling prose.

Dan Steffan

[info]timcasewalker

July 24 2007, 13:45:24 UTC 4 years ago

SF EYE Contributor

I wrote for SF Eye a few times, and I still miss the magazine. What a wonderful forum that was, and what a great feeling these many years later to have been a (small) part of it all.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…